I’ve heard some people respond to this question by saying, “Wherever
the toothbrush is”. I don’t see it that
way though. For me, home is where Lisa
is. And the dog. It’s important that I list them in that order
as Lisa reads this blog but I can’t neglect the dog. Lisa and I in a hotel room is not home. Throw in the dog, however, and it’s getting
pretty close. This makes it sound like
the dog is more important than Paige which is mostly not true but Paige’s
influence is diminished by the reality that someday, as her siblings have done,
she will fly the coop. But not Lisa.
Lisa = Home. Why do I raise this
now? In August, we mark ten years of
living here and when I mention this to people the first thing they say is
usually, “When do you plan to move back”?
The unstated word they leave out is “home”. As
adults we’ve lived many places in the US but never once did someone ask me when
I planned to return to Rhode Island or Lisa, to Miami. But here people assume that we’re biding our
time until we can move back “home”. Our family, as defined by next generation up
and next generation down, is extremely important to us but does not and could
not define home. With two daughters in
San Diego, a son in Houston and parents in Rhode Island and Florida, we’re too
spread out. Visiting them wouldn’t be
significantly easier if we lived stateside anyway. Cheaper, certainly, but still requiring
airports. Fortunately, in addition to holidays,
both Lisa and I have been able to tag on days to business trips so the
opportunities to see family hasn’t been as infrequent as one might think. The end result, in fact, is that we’ve seen
our parents more often while living here than we did when living in Chicago, St.
Louis, Kentucky or Pennsylvania. It’s a matter of making it a priority. So, if you want to ask us when we’re going to
return home we’ll probably say we’re already home but that next week or next
month or this fall, we’re going to San Diego or Florida or Houston or Rhode
Island. Because we don’t need to move to
those places. We just need to visit some
people who happen to live there.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Saturday, July 23, 2016
Trump’s NATO ignorance
Monday, July 4, 2016
Did I ask you what you think?
I got barked at today. By an old Swiss guy. It reminded me of the time not long after we
arrived when Lisa and Paige were on the tram with one of Paige’s friends and
her mother. The two girls were standing
on the spot between the cars that swivels when the tram takes a corner and
being kids, were swaying with the motion.
After a bit, an old guy stood up to leave. At the door, he paused then turned to bark at
Lisa and the other mom. Lisa understood
nothing of what he said but smiled, nodding politely. After he was gone, her Swiss friend said
that they’d just been told what awful mothers they were. This kind of interaction isn’t terribly
uncommon here and is unrelated to our status as foreigners. Generally, in fact, the complainer doesn’t
even realize this. It seems that these unhappy people are
surprisingly self-aware but they simply cannot help themselves (or don’t care). Paige
and her friends were recently scolded on the bus by a woman who continued at
the conclusion of her admonition to remark that they probably just thought she
was an unpleasant old lady. They were too polite to confirm her suspicion but they didn’t deny
it either.
Saturday, July 2, 2016
Schwingen
One of the elements of the Swiss experience that I
regrettably left off my Top 10 list was tradition. Switzerland is full of fun and interesting
traditions, some observed across the country and some locally. We try to experience as many of these as
possible, for example the cow fighting I posted about in April. In 2013 we attended Das Eidgenössische
Schwing und Älplerfest (sorry, no translation possible). A Swiss colleague encouraged me to go,
telling me that for pure, concentrated Swissness this is ground zero. It’s a sort of Swiss Olympic Games that’s
held every three years, each time in a different location. The sites are just vast open fields so for
each Games an enormous temporary arena capable of seating roughly 50,000 fans
is constructed. Since considerably more
than 50,000 people show up, several enormous screens are also set up in the grounds
surrounding the arena. The competition
is comprised of three different events, the main being a form of wrestling
called Schwingen, which takes place in a 12 meter diameter ring covered with
saw dust. The other two are Steinstossen
and Hornussen. Steinstossen
involves the throwing of a small boulder weighing 83.5 kg, which is a bit more
than I weigh. The winner generally
manages a hernia popping distance of about four meters. Hornussen is difficult to describe so I won’t
even try. Imagine Quiddich without the
brooms or flying. Checkout this website
if you’re interested (http://www.myswitzerland.com/en-ch/hornussen-where-the-nouss-flies-from-the-ramp-and-into-the-playing-field.html). The main event, however, is clearly
Schwingen. As with cow fighting, the
winner receives no cash. Just more glory
than you can shake an alpenhorn at and a giant pile of dry goods donated by
sponsors who are nevertheless not permitted to advertise. Washing machines. Lawnmowers.
Furniture. Tools. Livestock.
Sort of like the winners of 70’s game shows in the US (plus farm
animals). The event will be held this
summer so make your plans to attend.
Pure, distilled Swissness taking place in Estavayer (Canton Fribourg)
from August 26th to 28th.
Don’t miss it.
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Tort law
I’m no lawyer (although my oldest daughter is) so anything I
have to say about tort law is strictly from a
layman’s perspective. That being
said, I’ll state unequivocally that the Swiss approach to tort law is clearly
superior to the US version. Switzerland has laws designed to keep harmful
products off the market but if you want to do something stupid and hurt
yourself… Well, that’s your fault. Don’t blame someone else. With regards to medical malpractice suits, you
may be surprised to learn that it’s forbidden here for lawyers to participate
in any punitive damages or financial compensation their clients are awarded. They are paid strictly on a fee for service
basis. Plus, the burden of proof for
liability is much higher. The result, as you can imagine, is far fewer
lawsuits, lower malpractice premiums and a paltry level of CYA on the part of
doctors and hospitals. This was driven
home for us once several years ago when Paige was hospitalized for a severe
asthma attack. The situation was
stabilized quickly after admission but the doctors wanted to keep her overnight
until her blood oxygen remained above a certain level while sleeping. As it was not an issue while awake we asked
if she could be released temporarily to attend a Christmas performance in which
she was supposed to participate. They said,
sure, why not, and released her to our care, still wearing her hospital
bracelet, with our promise to return her to the hospital that evening. Think that would ever happen in the US?
Sunday, June 5, 2016
Subtle wealth
Switzerland is clearly a wealthy country. According to every study or report I’ve seen
it’s the richest in the world. The 2015 Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report compares
174 countries and lists Switzerland in the #1 position with the average adult
having a net worth of $567,122. New
Zealand was #2 ($400,811) followed by Australia ($364,896). The US and UK rounded out the top five with $352,996 and $320,368 respectively. When I read this I thought, wow, that’s a lot
of money. It doesn’t seem correct. Then I looked at the second column in the table,
the one showing the median adult wealth.
This shows how broadly this
wealth is distributed in each country and Switzerland gets a surprisingly low grade
in this category. When you look at the ratio
of average wealth to median wealth, Switzerland’s is 5.3, which isn’t as bad as
the US (7.1) but compared to New Zealand and Australia (both 2.2) it’s
considerably less fair than I expected. Another, more sophisticated metric that
economists use to measure fairness of wealth distribution is the Gini
coefficient. At the risk of oversimplifying the statistics
involved, the Gini is a quick way to assess how financially satisfied people
will be in the context of their culture and country. In yet more basic terms, it’s an indication
of how they see themselves compared to their neighbors. In
Gini terms, zero means that everyone has the same wealth and 100 means one guy
has it all. The Gini in Switzerland is 80.3 while in the US
it’s 85.0. To give a bit of perspective,
the average for European and North American countries is 74.8. Those Kiwi’s and Aussies? 65.5. Damn,
talk about finding an economic sweet spot.
Wealth and fairness, together. If you’re wondering where Putin’s kleptocracy ranks,
it’s a 91.2, which, as a bad as that sounds, it’s even worse when you consider
that the average net wealth in Russia is south of $12,000. The economic unsweet spot, poor and unfair. Anyway, back to the subject of this post,
subtle wealth. The reason that I was
surprised that Switzerland’s wealth is relatively unevenly distributed is that
you don’t see the level of ostentatiousness
here that you do in the US. Plainly, there are a lot of rich people
here. Try to find them though and
you’re bound to be disappointed as the Swiss are masters of subtle wealth. They’ll wear a watch worth more than your
retirement savings but hide it under a shirt sleeve. They are a private species and matters of
money may be viewed as the most private of all.
When I first moved here I noticed that even the model numbers on the
BMW’s and Mercedes, indicating the engine displacement (and value), are left off
the cars sold in Switzerland.
The attitude seems to be, why rub it in?
While you’re not likely to see a rich Swiss dressing down, you won’t see
them behaving flamboyantly either. And
you will never hear them publicly making a boorish statement like, “I’m rich,
really rich”. Ever.
By the way, have you ever met an unpleasant, unhappy Kiwi or
Aussie? Me neither.
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Culturally Swiss
Lisa and I moved here too late in life to ever really be
culturally Swiss. Sure, we share many of
the characteristics that are considered Swiss (follow rules, habitually on
time, fiscally conservative) but these are personality traits that we arrived
with and which partly explain why we’re so comfortably happy here. Paige, on the other hand, has developed into
a veritable Heidi. For her, we’ll never
know whether it was nature or nurture but she’s as Swiss as they come. Should we apply for Swiss citizenship,
there’s a requirement to demonstrate assimilation and she’s our ringer. Speaks perfect dialect? Check.
Member of several local clubs?
Check. Drinks Rivella
voluntarily? Check. Participates in Fasnacht? Double check ( five year member of a clique). Really the only non-Swiss behavior she exhibits
is that she answers the phone by saying “Hello”. You’ll hear no “Crump” barked out when calling our home.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)